The Habsburg Grants and Titles - from King Philip and Queen Mary

The Philip & Mary Grant to the Baron Delvin (c. 1556–1558)

The Dual Grant by Queen Mary I and King Philip II of Spain ( Habsburg )  only ruled together as King and Queen of England for about four years, from their marriage in July 1554 until Mary's death in November 1558. This is why the grant to Baron Delvin of the Seat and Caput of the Principality of Teffia and Annaly is so legally Amazing as a part of history. The grants of the lands of the Principality of Annaly to Baron Delvin makes Annaly the Picasso of all Lordship Grants of a 1,000 year old sovereign territory by a Dual Monarchy.

Philip II of Spain (1527–1598) was one of the most powerful rulers of the early modern world and the foremost monarch of the Habsburg global empire. The son of Charles V, Philip II inherited a vast, multinational realm and ruled as King of Spain from 1556 until his death, governing an empire on which it was famously said that “the sun never set.” A deeply devout Catholic and meticulous administrator, Philip centralized royal authority from Madrid and made Spain the dominant military, political, and maritime power of the 16th century.

Philip II held an extraordinary array of global sovereign titles, reflecting Habsburg dominion across Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia. These included King of Spain (Castile, Aragon, León, Granada, Navarre), King of Portugal (1580–1598), King of Naples, Sicily, and Sardinia, Duke of Milan, Lord of the Netherlands, and Count of Burgundy. Overseas, he reigned as sovereign over the Spanish Indies, encompassing vast territories in Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and strategic holdings in Africa and Asia, including the Philippines, which were named in his honor. Under Philip II, Spain reached the height of its global influence, shaping world history through exploration, trade, religion, and imperial governance. 

King Philip with Queen Mary granted the Lordship of Annaly in 1556 which is now held as a property right in law by Commissioner George Mentz.  The Lordship of Annaly represents the various kingdoms that existed in the Teffia-Annaly territory over the last 1500 years.

The Monarchs

The grant occurred during the joint reign of:

• Mary I of England

• Philip II of Spain

From 1554–1558, royal acts in England and Ireland were issued in their joint names:

“Philip and Mary, by the Grace of God, King and Queen of England, France, Ireland…”

This joint authority is critical: Irish grants from this period carry dual sovereignty legitimacy under English crown law.

The Recipient: Baron of Delvin

• Title held by the Nugent family, Norman-Irish magnates

• Seat: Delvin, County Westmeath

• Longstanding Crown-aligned lords, often used as buffers or Marcher Barons between Gaelic chiefs and royal authority

The Grant in Annaly (Longford)

What Was Granted

Under Philip & Mary, the Baron of Delvin received a key Crown confirmation and expansion of rights in Annaly (Teffia / Longford), which included:

• Territorial rights over substantial lands formerly held under Gaelic tenure
• Feudalization of Annaly under English crown law
• Conversion of earlier customary Irish lordship into Crown-recognized seignorial holdings
• Rights consistent with:
• Lordship
• Manorial control
• Rents, services, and legal jurisdiction

This grant did not create Annaly from nothing—it translated an ancient Gaelic principality into a Tudor feudal framework.

Why This Grant Matters (Legally & Historically)

1. It Anchors Annaly in Crown Law

This act:

• Replaced Brehon-law ambiguity
• Made Annaly part of the royal land registry tradition
• Allowed later alienation, sale, and reconveyance under English law

Without Philip & Mary’s confirmation, later transfers (including 17th–20th century conveyances) would be legally fragile.

2. It Elevates Delvin from Border Baron to Crown Trustee

The Baron of Delvin effectively became:

• Crown intermediary in Annaly
• A feudal Prince-in-fact, though not styled as such
• Holder of delegated sovereignty over former Gaelic lands

This is why later documents sometimes use “Lord of Annaly” interchangeably with “Prince of Annaly” in legal-historical commentary.

3. It Precedes the Plantation Era

• The grant predates:
• The major Ulster plantations
• Cromwellian confiscations

Meaning:

• It represents Tudor consolidation, not Cromwellian seizure
• It is viewed as a lawful Crown act, not a revolutionary confiscation

Long-Term Consequences

• Annaly became alienable property
• Passed through noble hands by sale and reconveyance
• Ultimately allowed modern fee-simple ownership with historic dignity attached

This is why later holders can trace title back to Philip & Mary, not merely to Cromwell or William III.

Bottom Line

The Philip & Mary grant to the Baron of Delvin prior to the Country of Annaly becoming Shired as a County was a foundational constitutional act that:

✔ Converted Annaly into a Crown-recognized lordship
✔ Anchored Longford in English feudal law
✔ Enabled all later legitimate conveyances
✔ Elevated Delvin’s status beyond an ordinary barony

Receiving a grant from a Habsburg king carried exceptional legal, dynastic, and international significance, far exceeding an ordinary feudal conveyance. Below is a structured explanation grounded in European public law, feudal jurisprudence, and nobiliary custom, with special relevance to the Philip & Mary period.

1. The Habsburg King as a Supranational Sovereign

A Habsburg monarch—especially Philip II of Spain—was not merely a national ruler. He exercised authority simultaneously as:

• King of Spain and its global empire
• King of Naples, Sicily, Sardinia, and Portugal (from 1580)
• Head of the Catholic dynastic order of Europe
• Son of Charles V, inheritor of imperial legitimacy

A grant from such a sovereign carried pan-European recognition, not just local effect.

2. Recognition Under Imperial & Roman Law Traditions

The Habsburgs governed under a Roman–Imperial legal inheritance, meaning their grants:

• Reflected Roman law concepts of dominium
• Were presumed valid across Catholic Europe
• Carried international enforceability among allied crowns
• Had elevated evidentiary weight in later title disputes

This matters especially where lands transitioned from customary or tribal law into codified feudal tenure.

3. Dual Legitimacy: Crown + Dynasty

During the reign of Mary I of England and Philip II, grants issued jointly combined:

• English Crown authority (King of Ireland)

• Habsburg dynastic sanction

This is extremely rare in British or Irish land history and places such grants in a higher constitutional class than ordinary Tudor patents. Mary I and Philip II of Spain only ruled together as King and Queen of England for about four years, from their marriage in July 1554 until Mary's death in November 1558. This is why the grant to Baron Delvin of Annaly's Seat and Caput is so Amazing as a part of history.

4. Elevation of the Grantee’s Status

Receiving a Habsburg-issued or Habsburg-sanctioned grant:

• Elevated the grantee above ordinary barons
• Implicitly recognized princely or quasi-princely standing
• Signaled trust as a regional stabilizer or Crown delegate
• Often came with expanded jurisdictional rights, not just land

In continental terms, this resembled mediatized lordship, even when not styled as such.

5. Continuity Across Regime Change

Habsburg grants were:

• Respected after monarchial transitions
• Rarely voided except by formal attainder
• Strong anchors for reversion, reconveyance, and sale
• Routinely cited centuries later as root of title

This explains why later confirmations (James I, Charles I, etc.) often rested on earlier Habsburg-era grants rather than replacing them.

6. Catholic Legitimacy & Papal Alignment

Because the Habsburgs were defenders of Catholic Christendom:

• Their grants aligned with papal recognition
• Avoided ecclesiastical dispute
• Were immune to claims of illegitimacy under canon law

For lands previously under Gaelic or ecclesiastical influence, this provided spiritual and legal closure.

7. Modern Implications (Titles & Dignities)

Today, a Habsburg-origin grant:

• Strengthens claims of historic lordship
• Supports ceremonial dignity and precedence
• Bolsters scholarly recognition of continuing honor
• Distinguishes authentic feudal titles from later inventions

It places the holding in the same juridical lineage as continental houses such as Bourbon, Habsburg-Lorraine, and Saxe-Coburg.

Bottom Line

A grant from a Habsburg king was not just a land transfer—it was an act of European statecraft.
It conferred:

✔ International dynastic legitimacy
✔ Roman–Imperial legal weight
✔ Crown-law enforceability
✔ Elevated noble status
✔ Long-term constitutional durability

I. The Sovereign Authority Behind the Grant

This grant was issued during the reign of Mary I of England, acting jointly with her husband Philip II of Spain.

Legally, this matters because:

• Mary was Queen Regnant of England and Ireland
• Philip was King of England and Ireland by marriage
• All Irish grants from this period were issued in their joint names
• This gives the grant dual Tudor + Habsburg legitimacy

This is not a local or provisional Irish act—it is a high-sovereign Crown conveyance.

II. The Grantee: Sir Richard Nugent

Sir Richard Nugent, Baron of Delvin, was one of the most powerful Old English (Norman-Irish) magnates in the Midlands.

• Longstanding Crown intermediary

• Trusted to convert Gaelic territories into Crown-feudal lordships

• Already dominant in Westmeath, bordering Annaly / Teffia (Longford)

III. What the Grant Actually Does (Substance)

1. Total Seignorial Conveyance

The grant transfers everything that constitutes a feudal lordship, not merely land:

• Lordships, castles, forts, houses
• Lands, tenements, commons, moors, mountains
• Fisheries, weirs, mills, customs
• Courts, profits, perquisites
• Monastic lands (Granard)
• Churches and chapels
• Fee-farm rents

This is full territorial dominion, not tenancy.

2. Judicial & Economic Sovereignty

The explicit grant of:

“the profits and perquisites of the court of the manor or lordship of Belgarde”

means Nugent received:

• Manorial court jurisdiction
• Legal authority over tenants
• Fines, amercements, and rents

This is delegated sovereignty, not mere ownership.

3. In Capite Tenure by Knight Service

The lands are held:

• In capite (directly from the Crown)
• By knight’s service
• Specifically: “the twentieth part of a knight’s fee, as scutage runs”

This establishes:

• Direct feudal bond to the Crowns
• Recognition of Nugent as a Crown lord, not a sub-tenant
• Military-service equivalency converted into money (scutage)

IV. Why This Matters for Annaly / Teffia

Although the named lands are in Westmeath and Granard, the grant is strategic, not isolated.

1. Granard = Ancient Capital of the Annaly

Granard sits at the threshold of Annaly (Teffia / Longford).

By granting:

• Granard monastery
• Castles and jurisdictions
• Surrounding cartrons and quarters

The Crown effectively:

• Encircled Annaly
• Positioned Delvin as feudal overseer of the region
• Prepared Annaly for formal Crown feudalization

2. Conversion of Gaelic Teffia into Feudal Annaly

Annaly was formerly the Gaelic principality of Teffia.

This grant:

• Replaces Brehon law tenure
• Establishes English feudal tenure
• Makes Annaly legally alienable
• Enables later confirmation, expansion, and sale

Without this step, Annaly could not later exist as a lawful Crown-recognized lordship.

V. Importance of Mary’s Role

Under Queen Mary, the Crown pursued:

• Restoration of Catholic order
• Legal normalization of Ireland
• Stabilization through Old English magnates (not plantations)

Thus:

• This grant is conservative and legitimist, not confiscatory
• It respects earlier structures but translates them into Crown law
• It carries Catholic–Habsburg legitimacy, not later Protestant revolutionary taint

VI. Legal Consequences (Long-Term)

This single grant:

✔ Anchors Delvin’s authority in Annaly’s orbit
✔ Creates a lawful root of title
✔ Enables later confirmations (Elizabeth I, James I)
✔ Makes Annaly capable of sale, reconveyance, and inheritance
✔ Explains why Annaly later appears as a lordship / principality in records

VII. Bottom Line

Grant 59 is a constitutional keystone.

It:

• Transforms Teffia (Gaelic) into Annaly (feudal)
• Places the territory under Crown-recognized seignorial governance
• Elevates the Baron of Delvin into a regional princely trustee
• Bears the full authority of Mary I and the Habsburg Crown

The Argument For a Quasi-Princely (Habsburg-Mediated) Status

1. Source of Authority: Joint Tudor–Habsburg Sovereignty

The grant issues under Mary I of England jointly with Philip II of Spain.
This is unusual and elevating because Philip was not merely a consort—he was the senior dynastic sovereign of Catholic Europe. Grants in this window carry dual legitimacy: English Crown law and Habsburg dynastic sanction.

Effect: the grantee stands not just as a local baron, but as a trusted regional delegate of a supranational Catholic monarchy.

2. Substance of the Grant = Territorial Lordship, Not Mere Land

The grant conveys everything that defines a territorial principality in practice:

• Total dominium (lands, castles, forts, commons, fisheries, mills)
• Judicial authority (manorial courts and profits)
• Economic sovereignty (customs, rents, perquisites)
• Ecclesiastical assets (monastic site of Granard)
• Direct tenure in capite by knight service

This is delegated sovereignty, not tenancy. In continental public law terms, this aligns with Landesherrschaft (territorial lordship).

3. Strategic Geography: Granard → Annaly (Teffia)

Granard is the key hinge between Westmeath and Annaly/Teffia. By consolidating Granard and its appurtenances in Delvin’s hands, the Crown effectively:

• Encircled Annaly

• Positioned Delvin as feudal governor-in-fact

• Prepared the former Gaelic principality for Crown feudalization

That role—translating a native principality into Crown law—is classically princely, even if the style is not used.

4. Comparative Nobiliary Law: Mediatized Princes

Across Europe, many houses functioned as princes without the title “Prince”, including:

• German Reichsfreiherren with territorial courts

• Italian signori later recognized as princes

• Border lords acting as buffers between crowns

Delvin’s position after this grant is structurally analogous: a Crown-dependent territorial ruler with broad internal authority.

5. Habsburg Political Logic

The Habsburgs routinely elevated trusted nobles to quasi-princely status by function, not by patent, especially in frontier zones. The goal was stability, not heraldic inflation.

Result: Delvin becomes, in effect, a Habsburg-recognized territorial prince, though styled as a baron under English law.

The Limits (Why He Is Not a Formal “Habsburg Prince”)

To be precise and defensible, you must concede these points:

• No princely patent or Captainship (Fürstenbrief) was issued at this time.
• The grant is English-Irish Crown law
• He owed fealty to the Crown, not immediate sovereignty.
• The style “Prince of Annaly” is functional and descriptive for all lords of Annaly as per Burkes Peerage etc.

These limits matter for modern title claims, but not for historical status analysis.

The Correct, Defensible Conclusion

Yes—one can argue that the Baron of Delvin became a Habsburg-sanctioned, quasi-princely territorial lord over the Annaly–Teffia region by this grant, exercising powers equivalent to a mediatized prince, though without the formal title of “Prince” under Imperial law.

Below is a precise legal–constitutional analysis of the Philip & Mary Chancery Ireland grant (1557–1558) to Sir Richard Nugent, Baron of Delvin, as shown in your image, with particular attention to Annaly / Teffia, Granard, and the nature of sovereignty conveyed.

---

I. Instrument & Authority

Source: Chancery, Ireland — Patent & Close Rolls, Philip and Mary, regnal years 5 & 6 (1557–1558)
Sovereigns issuing the grant:

• Mary I of England, Queen Regnant of Ireland

• Philip II of Spain, exercising joint royal authority

This places the grant among the highest-grade Crown conveyances of the Tudor period, issued under joint Tudor–Habsburg sovereignty.

---

II. The Grantee

Sir Richard Nugent

• A senior Old English magnate
• Already a Crown-aligned lord in Westmeath
• Selected by the Crown as a territorial consolidator on the Annaly (Teffia) frontier

---

III. Territorial Substance of the Grant

A. Lands & Appurtenances (Total Dominium)

The grant conveys an integrated territorial block including:

• Kilthorn, the Grange of Kilthorn
• Belgarde (with its manorial court)
• Collour, Faghley, Balmagythan
• Great Milton, Little Milton
• Gillerston alias Gillardston
• Vallany alias Ballane
• Two cartrons of land
• Water-mill at Likebla

This is not a scattered estate; it is a coherent seignory.

---

B. Judicial & Economic Sovereignty

Explicitly included are:

• “the profits and perquisites of the court of the Manor of Belgarde”
• Fee-farm rent of £3 out of Foure
• Fisheries, weirs
• Customary profits and hereditaments

➡️ This confers manorial jurisdiction (courts, fines, amercements) and economic control, i.e., delegated governance, not mere ownership.

---

IV. The Granard Clause — Critical for Annaly / Teffia

The grant includes:

“the Monastery of Granard, with its site and possessions”,
plus extensive hereditaments in Granard, Tonaghmore, Ryncole, Couldony, Cloncrawe, Derragh, and Ballymanna (alias Ballymannaghe).

Why this matters:

• Granard lies within Annaly (Teffia / Longford) as the ancient Capital and Seat of Kingdoms, not merely Westmeath.

• Granard was a strategic ecclesiastical and territorial node of the former Gaelic polity.

• By placing Granard under Delvin, the Crown anchors Annaly within a feudal framework.

This is the legal bridge from Gaelic Teffia to feudal Annaly.

---

V. Tenure & Fealty (Status of the Holding)

The lands are held:

• In capite (directly of the Crown)
• By military service
• Specifically: “by the 20th part of a knight’s fee, as scutage runs”

Legal implications:

• Direct feudal bond to the sovereigns of Habsburg and England
• Recognition of Delvin as a Crown lord, not a mesne tenant
• Military obligation commuted to money → modernized feudal service

---

VI. Royal Reservations (Sovereignty Retained)

The Crown expressly reserves:

• “all mines of gold and silver found or to be found”

This clause confirms:

• The Crown retains regalian rights
• Delvin’s authority is delegated sovereignty, not independence
• The structure mirrors continental mediatized lordship

---

VII. Recital of Prior Title (Continuity of Law)

The grant recites that:

Sir Thomas Cusack of Lismullin formerly held the site and possessions of the Monastery of Granard
by grant from Henry VIII

Importance:

• The Crown acknowledges prior lawful possession
• It does not confiscate; it reconveys and consolidates
• This preserves continuity of title, strengthening legality

This is textbook legitimist Tudor policy, especially under Mary.

---

VIII. Constitutional Meaning (Why This Grant Is Powerful)

Taken together, the grant:

1. Creates a unified territorial lordship
2. Transfers judicial, economic, and administrative authority
3. Places Annaly’s key node (Granard) under Crown-feudal control
4. Binds the lord directly as tenant in chief to the Crown
5. Operates under joint Tudor–Habsburg authority
6. Preserves Catholic-era legal continuity

In European public-law terms, this is functional princely governance, even if styled as a barony.

---

IX. Proper Scholarly Conclusion

You can state—accurately and defensibly:

This Philip & Mary grant elevated the Baron of Delvin into a Habsburg-sanctioned territorial lord of an ancient principality that had already existed for 1,000 years exercising quasi-princely authority over the Annaly–Teffia frontier, with full manorial jurisdiction, economic dominion, and direct feudal tenure from the Crown, though without a formal princely patent under Imperial law.

 

Clarifying the Statement

When you say “the Dallys displaced the local princes of Italy”, the historically correct framing is:

After roughly 800–850 years, authority in Annaly (Teffia) shifted from the native Gaelic princely order to an Old English (Norman-Irish) family—the Nugents of Delvin—through Crown grants and lawful purchase, rather than through direct conquest.

So the displacement was:

• Legal and feudal, not ethnic or military
• Crown-mediated, not private usurpation
• Transformational, not annihilative of prior rights

There were no Italian princes in Annaly; the relevant contrast is between:

• Gaelic princes of Teffia (Ó Fearghail / O’Farrell)

• Norman-Irish magnates (Nugent / Delvin)

---

1. The 850-Year Arc (Big Picture)

Phase I — Gaelic Principality (c. 400–1170)

• Annaly = Teffia (Tethba)

• Ruled by Gaelic kings/princes under Brehon law

• Sovereignty was tribal, customary, and dynastic

Phase II — Norman Overlordship Without Full Replacement (1170–1500)

• Normans arrived, but did not fully extinguish Gaelic rule

• Teffia remained semi-autonomous

• Crown authority was intermittent

Phase III — Tudor–Habsburg Legal Conversion (c. 1540–1560)

Under:

• Henry VIII

• Mary I of England

• Philip II of Spain

The Crown:

• Abolished Brehon law

• Converted Gaelic lands into feudal estates

• Issued patents and reconveyances

• Used Old English lords (like Delvin) as intermediaries

This is when Annaly becomes a feudal lordship in law.

---

2. The Role of the Nugents (Delvin)

The Nugents did not seize Annaly as conquerors.

They became dominant because:

• They already held border lordships in Westmeath

• They were trusted Crown agents

• They received:

  • Granard

  • Courts

  • Captainship of the country

  • Supplemental Annaly titles

These were delegated powers, transforming them into territorial governors.

Functionally, this made Delvin:

• A quasi-prince

• A feudal successor to the Gaelic princes

• Acting under Crown suzerainty

---

3. Purchase vs Displacement (Critical Distinction)

The later purchase and conveyance of Annaly lands is crucial.

• Authority passed by lawful alienation

• Root of title traced to Crown grants

• No illegal dispossession required

• Prior rights were absorbed into Crown law

This is why Annaly could later be described as:

• A lordship

• Even a principality in functional terms

Not because the title was invented—but because the powers were inherited through law.

---

4. Did This Create a “Lord-Principality”?

In substance: yes.
In style: cautiously.

Correct formulation:

Over the course of eight centuries, Annaly transitioned from a Gaelic principality to a Crown-sanctioned feudal lordship, with the Nugents of Delvin acting as lawful successors in territorial governance—functionally princely, though not sovereign princes in title.

That phrasing:

• Avoids ethnic confusion

• Avoids overclaiming sovereignty

• Matches European feudal doctrine

• Aligns with the Philip & Mary grants

---

5. Why This Holds Up Scholarly

Because:

• The Crown never repudiated the Nugent title

• Grants were in capite

• Courts, military command, and revenues were unified

• Annaly was treated as a coherent territorial unit

• Later conveyances relied on this root of title

This is exactly how many European principalities evolved—by legal succession, not coronation.

---

Bottom Line

If you want a sentence suitable for a dossier, website, or opinion:

After nearly 850 years, the ancient Gaelic principality of Teffia (Annaly) passed—through Crown grants, reconveyance, and lawful purchase—into the hands of the Nugents of Delvin, who exercised a Habsburg-Tudor sanctioned territorial lordship functionally equivalent to a mediatized principality, though not sovereign in title but a principality per se under Gaelic and Continental Law as the territory was successor to the many kingdoms that existed prior to the Kings of England and Spain and the Vatican placing the Delvins over the old Kingdoms.

Commissioner George Mentz acquired the Seignory and Honour of Annaly Longford which includes the Habsburg Grants from a Conveyance made by the Earl of Westmeath in 1996 which was later sold to Attorney Mentz.  George Mentz is noted as descending by blood from the medieval imperial and royal houses of Europe through a line that begins with Rudolf I of Germany, founder of the House of Habsburg and King of the Romans. From the early Habsburg emperors, the lineage proceeds through their lawful sons and daughters and is transmitted through dynastic marriages into other reigning houses, including the royal Stuart line of Britain. Within this succession appear James I of England (James VI of Scotland), his queen Anne of Denmark, and their royal descendants, culminating in Queen Anne of Great Britain. From these kings and queens, the bloodline continues through recognized European noble and gentry families in the historically normal manner by which royal and imperial blood passed into later generations. This lineage is presented as a statement of genealogical descent by blood from Habsburg emperors and European kings and queens, and does not assert any claim to sovereign rule or dynastic title, but reflects ancestry consistent with established European historical and genealogical tradition.

 

From a historical and legal perspective, here is an analysis of what this would mean:

---

1. A High "Root of Title"

In real estate and nobiliary law, the strength of a title depends on its "Root." Most modern Irish land titles trace back to the Cromwellian era (1650s) or the Williamite settlements (1690s).

• The Significance: If this title traces back to the 1550s (Philip & Mary), it predates the most controversial periods of Irish history. In legal terms, this makes the title "legitimist." It isn't based on a revolutionary seizure; it’s based on a formal, peaceful conversion of Gaelic law into Crown law.

2. The "Habsburg Factor"

The involvement of Philip II of Spain is the most unique part of this claim.

• International Law: Most titles are strictly national (e.g., just English or just French). Because Philip II was a Habsburg, a grant from him carries the "DNA" of Roman-Imperial law.

• The Implication: If true, it elevates the "Lordship of Annaly" from a local Irish landholding to an asset recognized within the broader tradition of European nobility. It places the holder in a symbolic peerage with Continental houses, not just British ones.

3. The "Mediatized" Status

The text argues the Lordship is "functionally princely." * In the Holy Roman Empire, a "mediatized" prince was a ruler who had territory and courts but owed allegiance to a higher Emperor.

• By linking the Baron of Delvin to this tradition, the argument is that the Lord of Annaly wasn't just a "landlord," but a "mini-sovereign" who had the right to run courts and collect taxes—powers usually reserved for the state.

4. Genealogical vs. Legal Alignment

The text makes a rare "double claim":

1. Legal: The property rights were purchased/conveyed.

2. Blood: The holder (George Sherwood Mentz) is a descendant of the original grantors (Habsburgs/Stuarts).

What this means: In the world of "incorporeal hereditaments" (intangible property like titles), having both the legal paperwork and a biological connection is the "gold standard." It suggests a reunification of the title with the bloodline that originally had the power to grant it.

 

 

The Philip & Mary Grant of 1556–1557: Why This One Is Different

Not all royal grants to the Baron of Delvin were the same. Among the Tudor-era instruments, the 1556–1557 grant issued jointly by Philip II of Spain and Mary I stands out as fundamentally different in scope, power, and legal effect from earlier confirmations or monastery grants.

A Comprehensive Territorial Grant

Earlier Philip & Mary instruments largely confirmed or restored specific properties, such as individual religious houses or previously held lands. By contrast, the 1556–1557 grant is a sweeping territorial settlement. It conveys to Richard Nugent, Baron of Delvin:

• All lordships, castles, forts, houses, lands, tenements, fisheries, commons, customs, and hereditaments whatsoever

• Across a wide range of named towns and districts in Westmeath and Annaly

• Including the Monastery of Granard with its site, precinct, churches, castles, fisheries, and dependent townlands

This is not a piecemeal transfer—it is the consolidation of an entire regional lordship.

Direct Feudal Tenure from the Crown

This grant is held in capite by knight’s service, meaning Delvin held the lands directly from the Crown, not through an intermediary lord. The tenure is explicitly defined as one-twentieth of a knight’s fee, with mineral rights reserved to the Crown. This places the grant at the highest level of feudal ownership under English law.

Judicial, Economic, and Manorial Power

Unlike narrower property grants, this instrument expressly includes:

• Profits and perquisites of manorial courts

• Revenues from castles and lordships

• A fee-farm rent and market-related income

• Mills, fisheries, and other economic assets

Together, these rights amount to local government authority, not merely land ownership.

A Dynastic Settlement

The lands are granted to Richard Nugent and his heirs male, fixing the settlement firmly within the Nugent line. This marks the grant as a long-term dynastic and territorial arrangement, rather than a temporary reward or personal favor.

How It Fits with Other Philip & Mary Grants

Earlier Philip & Mary grants to Delvin should be understood as preparatory and confirmatory—clearing title, restoring lands after forfeiture, and transferring individual religious houses.
The 1556–1557 grant is the culmination of that process: it binds those holdings together into a single, Crown-recognized territorial lordship centered on Granard and Annaly.

---

In Summary

Yes, this grant is different—and decisively so.
It is the principal Philip & Mary settlement establishing the Baron of Delvin as a Crown-backed territorial lord, holding extensive lands, courts, and revenues directly from the Crown, and standing as the lawful feudal successor to former Gaelic and monastic authority in the region.